Home ] Sheepish Wolves ] Synagogue of Satan ] Which Bible Is God's Word? ] The Israel of God ] The Gospel ] The Anti-Gospel ] The Antichrist ] News ] [ Pictures ] Books ] Conspiracy ] 911 ] Articles ] eBooks ] Great Mountain Publishing ] Great Mountain Church ]




Search WWW Search

Each of the pictures below is a thumbnail of a larger picture.  To see the detail of the full size picture, click on the thumbnail and a page will open showing the full size picture.
"I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and he went forth conquering, and to conquer."  Revelation 6:2
"And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon."  Revelation 13:11
John Surratt, coconspirator in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, photographed wearing the uniform of the Papal Zouave while hiding out in Europe after the assassination under the protection of the Roman Catholic Church as a member of the pope's personal guard.
Can you spot the satanic symbol carved in the back of the pope's throne? (Sea of Galilee: March 24, 2000)
At left are two photographs of dignitaries signing the Constitution of the European Union on 29 October 2004 at Rome’s Capitoline Hill.  The black and white photo is that of British Prime Minister Tony Blair taking his part in the ceremony.  They spent years planning the ceremony whereby the leaders of the member nations making up the European Union would sign the the constitution of that union and thus hand over to a new European government the sovereignty of their countries.  Everything was planned down to the last detail.  Everything present at the ceremony was there for a purpose.  So whom do you see wearing a triple crown with his condescending gaze overseeing the ceremony?  Why it is none other than colossal statue of Pope Innocent X.  The triple crown signifies the official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church that the pope of Rome rules over heaven, earth, and hell!  The ceremony was dominated by the statue, with the dignitaries signing the constitution being relegated to a rather insignificant posture below the towering figure of the pope of Rome.  This picture symbolizes the real power behind the European Union.

The top photograph is a photograph taken by AP photographer James Altgen immediately after President Kennedy was hit with the first bullet. What is important about the photo is that in the background Altgen also photographs who appears to be Lee Harvey Oswald standing in the first floor doorway of the Texas Schoolbook Depository at the very moment Kennedy was shot.  The second and third photos are blowups of the Oswald figure in the doorway.  According to the official Warren Commission Report, Oswald was supposed to be shooting at Kennedy from the 6th Floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository.  In order to cover for this obvious problem, the Warren Commission identified the individual in the doorway as Billy Lovelady, a fellow Book Depository employee who had a similar appearance to Oswald.  Lovelady died on January 1979 from heart failure (the later House Committee Report on Assassinations was issued in March 1979, having begun in 1976).  Lovelady identified himself as the person in the Altgens' photo to the Warren Commission.  One problem with Lovelady's claim is that he testified before the Warren Commission that he was sitting on the steps to the Texas Book Depository eating his lunch when the Presidential motorcade drove by.  He stated that two fellow employees, Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, were "right behind" him.  As one can see in the photo, nobody is standing behind the person in the doorway and that person is clearly standing in the doorway, not sitting on the steps.  Lovelady stated that he then heard what he thought at the time were firecrackers.  He did not know that President Kennedy had been shot until a coworker, Gloria Cavalry, ran up and told him.  If it was Lovelady in the entranceway, he would not have had to been told that the President had been shot, because the man in the entranceway had a perfect line of site to the events.  As one can see, the person in the entranceway is looking at Kennedy at the moment the first shot hit Kennedy; he would have seen the final shot explode President Kennedy's head; he would have seen Mrs. Kennedy crawling on the trunk of the limousine grabbing his brains and the Secret Service agent jump in the limousine before it sped off.  The whole purpose for people to be watching the motorcade was to see the President, and man in the entranceway was no exception; he was looking directly at President Kennedy as he was being shot.  Furthermore, if Lovelady were the man in the doorway, he would have testified to what he saw, but he did not, because he was sitting down on the steps eating his lunch; he was only able to testify to what he heard.  That point is made clear by the question not asked by the Warren Commission counsel.  The Counsel asked Lovelady what he heard, but he did not ask Lovelady what he saw.  Why didn't he ask Lovelady such a basic question like "what did you see?"  Because he knew that Lovelady would testify that he did not see anything at the time of the shooting, because he was sitting down eating his lunch.  If he did not see anything, then he could not have been the man in the doorway, because the man in the doorway is looking directly at the limousine at the time the first shot hits Kennedy!  If Lovelady answered that he did not see anything, it would have established that it was Oswald in the doorway, and that was something the Warren Commission did not want established.  Another problem with that identification is that Lovelady stated that he wore a red and white vertically striped shirt that day.  Other photos taken on November 22, 1963 revealed that Lovelady was in fact wearing a large squared, bold patterned, red and blue plaid shirt.  The man in the doorway could not be Lovelady, because it does not appear that the man is wearing either a striped or a plaid patterned shirt.  The real fly in the Lovelady story is that the man in the doorway appears to be wearing the same clothing Oswald was wearing on that very day, the day Oswald was arrested, and the clothing is worn by him in exactly the same fashion as  the man in the doorway: unbuttoned to the midsection.  The fourth photograph down is a photograph taken of Oswald shortly after his arrest, the day President Kennedy was shot.  Notice, he is wearing the same tweed shirt and tee-shirt combination, with the shirt halfway open.  Reportedly, color film photographs taken from a different angle that day, show the color of the shirt worn by the man in the doorway to be orange-brown. When Oswald was arrested, he was wearing the identical orange-brown shirt with missing buttons and tee-shirt underneath.  Reportedly, Oswald told the Dallas Police that he was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository when Kennedy was shot, just as depicted in the photo.  It appears that Oswald was just what he said he was: a "patsy."  The conspirators had to kill Oswald, because they knew that the evidence against him would never stand up to courtroom scrutiny.  The fifth photo in the sequence is a montage of photos that appeared on pages 24 and 25 of the December 14, 1963 issue of Post.  Notice in the fourth car back the Secret Service Agents in Vice President Lyndon Johnson's detail are getting out of their cars to come to the protection of LBJ as the shots are heard.  That indicates that the motorcade must have come to a complete stop, which is consistent with the numerous eyewitnesses who saw the motorcade come to a complete stop.  It is much easier to shoot a stationary target, and the conspirators planned to have the Kennedy limousine stopped.  Oddly, Kennedy's Secret Service detail had not yet even made a move to protect Kennedy after the first shot.  The sixth photo is a Warren Commission exhibit.

The assassination of President Kennedy could not have happened without the cooperation of the Secret Service hierarchy. The picture sequence at left are screen captures of frames from a video taken at Love Field in Dallas after the arrival of President Kennedy on the day he was assassinated. Notice in frame the top frame the two Secret Service Agents are running at either bumper of he Presidential Limousine, which was standard operating procedure. In fact the limousine has specially designed handles and foot platforms for the Secret Service Agents to ride on the back of the car as it is travels at procession speeds. You can see the Secret Service Supervisor, Emory Roberts, stand up in the trailing car and orders the two agents to leave their assigned posts. You can see the two agents turning their heads in response to the Roberts voice command. In the second frame down from the top, you can see Secret Service Agent Henry Rybka, the agent who was running along side the right bumper, is completely perplexed by the order. He is waiving his hands as if to ask "what is going on?" He continues to waive his hands, and you can see in the third frame down his hands are out by his side in exasperation. In the fourth frame Agent Rybka is standing with his arms up in the air; he is totally perplexed by what is going on, as the motorcade leaves him behind. Agent Rybka clearly did not understand the reason for the order. He no doubt had been trained to stay along side the presidential limousine and had done so in the past. The order from Roberts was contrary to the standard operating procedure of the Secret Service. Obviously, Emory Roberts understood what was to happen, and he wanted to make sure the assassins had a clear shot at an unguarded President. What is interesting is that once Roberts saw that the agents had left their posts per his instructions, he sat back down in the trailing car. His mission was accomplished.
According to the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald, from his perch on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, shot Kennedy in the back of his head. That theory is a complete and utter deception by the Warren Commission. The physical evidence contradicts that cover story, because the wound in the back of President Kennedy’s head was an exit wound. That means that Kennedy was shot in the head by a shooter in front of him. It would be physically impossible for the shot that struck Kennedy in the head to have been shot by Oswald from Oswald’s fictional position on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, which was behind Kennedy. When a bullet enters a body it makes a small entrance wound approximately the diameter of the bullet; depending on the circumstances, the bullet hole could be slightly larger or slightly smaller than the bullet. It is a fundamental principle of wound ballistics that when a bullet goes through a body and exits at the other end, it generally makes a significantly larger exit wound.  According to the Mercer University School of Medicine: "Exit wounds are generally larger than entrance wounds, due to the fact that the bullet has expanded or tumbled on its axis."  This phenomenon is even more apparent when a high velocity rifle bullet strikes a human skull. That is because the human skull contains the soft tissue of the brain surrounded by the inelastic hard bone of the skull. According to the Department of Forensic Medicine at the University of Dundee: "High velocity gunshot wounds of the head produce bursting injuries of the skull due to temporary cavity formation."  The bursting of the skull is never at the entrance site, it is always at and contiguous to the exit site of the bullet. The exit wound to the back of President Kennedy’s head was approximately the size of a baseball. The picture sequence in the thumbnail at left is from the book Murder in Dealey Plaza and depicts eighteen (18) eyewitnesses explaining the size and location of the large gaping wound in President Kennedy’s head. Each picture is a frame from video interviews of each of the witnesses showing the witnesses describing a large wound suffered by Kennedy to the rear of his head. As you can see all 18 witnesses remembered the large wound in substantially the same place in the back of President Kennedy’s head. In order to have an exit wound in the rear, the shooter must have shot Kennedy from the front. That means that Oswald could not have been the shooter, because Oswald could not have struck Kennedy with a bullet in the front of his head, if Oswald were shooting from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, which was behind Kennedy.
The image at left is from the cover of the manual "Managing Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents: An Executive Level Program for Sheriffs."  The manual was distributed as part of a training program teaching local law enforcement how to deal with terrorist attacks. The program was put on by the U.S. Department of Justice. The cover is imprinted with the seal of the U.S. Department of Justice and the National Sheriffs' Association. This publication was dated June 2000.  Notice that the cover graphic is of the World Trade Center in cross-hairs.  This was published over a year before the 9-11-01 attacks on the World Trade Center.
The World Trade Center in cross-hairs graphic at left is found on page 49 of the 1 August 1999 U.S. Air Force Manual 10-100.  It was titled Airman's Manual.  The manual was published over two years prior to the 9-11-01 attacks on the World Trade Center.  The graphic was used in the manual as an illustration near text which advised against collocating military units in those areas that would be potential targets for the enemy.  The graphic was removed from the later June 2004 version of the manual.
The picture on the right is a picture of the person that is identified as Osama Bin Laden in the "smoking gun" tape trotted out by the government that allegedly showed Osama Bin Laden confessing to the 9-11 attacks.  The picture on the left is the real Osama Bin Laden. Check out the differences in the noses and the ears! It is obvious that these are two different people. President Bush said the following in defense of the video: "Those who contend it's a farce or a fake are hoping for the best about an evil man. This is Bin Laden unedited. This is... the Bin Laden who murdered the people. This is a man who sent innocent people to their death."  Do you believe your own eyes, or do you believe George W. Bush?  Click on the pictures to enlarge them.
"Can two walk together, except they be agreed?" Amos 3:3.  Who do we see here?  It is the leader of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan, meeting with seven members of the Neturei Karta, an  international orthodox Jewish organization.  In 1999, they met and exchanged prayers one in Hebrew the other in Arabic to their respective gods.  No doubt that Jews and Muslims hate each other; Satan's kingdom is built on hatred, and thus all members of Satan's kingdom hate each other. The issue is what do they each agree upon?  They agree that they have a common enemy - Christ and those who have Christ in them - Christians!    Satan's religions, full of hate,  are allied against Christianity - they are antichrist!  They will set aside their differences in order to attack Christ and his followers.
The real power behind the Presidency.

As amazing as it sounds, the objective evidence clearly and irrefutably points to the fact that the planes that were seen on television crashing into the Twin Towers were in fact computer generated images (CGI). At left from top to bottom are three frames from an ABC News broadcast of the second plane hitting the south tower. The three sequential frames from the video broadcast by ABC. There is a glitch in the CGI.  The wing is intact in the top frame, it disappears in the middle frame, and it then reappears in the third frame. Notice the time stamp indicating that the wing blinks off and then back on again, within approximately one second. It is almost too fast for the eye to see when it is in motion, unless a person were looking for it. That is evidence that the major media outlets were in on the conspiracy, and that they used CGI to cover the fact that no airliners struck the WTC towers on 911. ABC claimed that they received the video from a person free of charge.

In the frames from the film sequence at left, which is supposed to show the second plane crashing into WTC 2, you can see how the Computer Generated Imagery (CGI) of the plane becomes corrupted before it even reaches the building. The sequence begins at the top frame, with both wings of the aircraft clearly visible. However, as the dark gray left wing and the light gray right wing intersect with the dark gray background on the left and light gray background on the right, the computer is unable to distinguish the wings from the background. Consequently, the computer leaves the right wing behind in the light background of the clouds, and left wings is left behind in the dark gray background at the top of the tower. By the time the plane passes the mixed shade backgrounds and emerges into the uniform mid-gray background of the middle section of the tower in the bottom frame, the left wing from the engine onward has completely disappeared and the right wing has only a small remnant remaining. This is more evidence that the media broadcast CGIs of planes on 9-11. There were no real planes used.
At left is evidence that the plane shown by the news media flying into tower 2 in their many videos were not live videos of a plane, but rather computer generated imagery (CGI) used to deceive the public. "Several videos clearly show a fully-intact ‘plane’ exiting the north face of WTC2. For these images to be real, steel beams would have to be shorn, just as they seemingly were on the entry face. However, there are clearly no sections of steel beams missing from the picture on the right."
The picture at left is a still from the news video feed from the South Tower hit. Notice that there is no break in the building wall between the port (left) engine and fuselage (passenger compartment).  It is impossible for a thin aluminum skin aircraft to pierce through thick steel pillars and solid concrete floors.  What is even more unbelievable is that the building seems to be self healing.  There is no damage to the building where the left wing supposedly cut through the steel and concrete.  That is clear evidence that the plane is not real, it is a computer generated graphic.
The picture at left is a frame from a BBC live broadcast on 9-11-01 that announces the collapse of WTC building 7 (also known as the Solomon Brothers Building). The announcer had earlier told the audience that the Solomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed (20 minutes before the actual collapse). He repeats the announcement again at 5:07 p.m. EST. At approximately 5:07 p.m. EST the newscaster states: "Now more on the latest building collapse in New York, you may might heard a few moments ago us talking about the Solomon Brothers Building collapsing, and indeed it has.... Jane what more can you tell us about the Solomon Brothers Building and its collapse?" The curious thing about the broadcast video is that the building did not collapse until 13 minutes later, at approximately 5:20 p.m. EST. After the announcer tells the audience that Solomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed, he goes to a live feed to Jane Standley on the scene in New York. Initially her head blocks WTC 7, but she later moves and shows the audience the smoke rising from towers 1 and 2. When she does that you can see WTC 7 clearly standing in the background. When she resumes her appearance on the screen you can see WTC 7 in the background over her left shoulder and to the left of her left ear. Someone at the BBC jumped the gun and had the script read too early. This is evidence that 911 was scripted in advance, and that the major media outlets were part of the conspiracy. The BBC now claims that they lost the original time stamped tapes. Think about that explanation. The BBC, which is known for its meticulous record keeping and storage of news archives going back over 50 years, inexplicably loses live news footage documenting the crime of the century! That explanation does not pass the smell test. In any event, the time stamped original is not needed, because the taped broadcast clearly shows WTC 7 in the background as the BBC is broadcasting live news of it supposedly having collapsed.
At left are a series of three different photographs of a woman standing in the gash left by the impact of the second plane that hit the north tower of the World Trade Center on 9-11-01.  In order to get to the crash opening the woman would have had to walk through the floor upon which she is standing.  According to the official story, however, that area of the tower was a raging inferno, hot enough to melt solid steel girders (approximately 2,700 ° F; 1,500 ° C).  That is impossible since commercial jet fuel (Jet-A), which is pure kerosene, burns in the air at a maximum temperature of 1,500 ° F; 800 ° C.  Experts have calculated that the temperature of a burning floor at the WTC was not even close to the temperature needed to weaken, let alone melt, steel girders.  That conclusion would seem to be supported by the appearance of the woman.  As you can see the woman appears to be in good health; neither her hair nor her clothing is even singed.  So we know that the fire was localized and not a raging inferno sufficient to melt steel girders. 

If one reflects upon it, one can understand that it is impossible for a burning hydrocarbon of any kind, without supplementation from pure oxygen, to melt steel.  If that were possible, then we would find people who cook on natural gas stoves melting their aluminum and steel pots and pans.  That would happen with regularity since natural gas stoves are very efficient and burn much hotter than kerosene.  That would be a particular problem with aluminum pots and pans since aluminum melts at a lower point than steel.  In fact, if the official WTC story were true, stove burners themselves, which are made of rather thin steel would be melting with regularity.  We know that is not the case; so also we know that the fires at the WTC did not cause the collapse of the towers.

Notice how the approximately 40 story tall steel spire remnant of the superstructure of the North Tower (WTC 1) suddenly turns to dust.  How can that happen?  Dr. Judy Wood (Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science) opines that could only happen if there is molecular disassociation.  The only technology that can cause such a drastic molecular disintegration from solid to dust is a directed energy weapon.  Directed energy weapons are not science fiction, they are science reality.  Read through the material from the Air Fore Research Laboratory, Directed Energy Directorate.  The use of directed energy on 9-11 would  explain why there was so little rubble from the collapse of the two 1/4 mile high towers.  Most of the concrete, steel columns, and steel beams were turned to dust.  The more mass an object has the more energy is absorbed.  That explains why there were sheets of paper floating to the ground on 9-11, because they have little mass to absorb directed energy.
At left is a thumbnail of a photo of the collapse area of World Trade Center Towers 1 & 2, taken on September 13, 2001, two days after the destruction of the WTC towers. Click on the thumbnail to enlarge the picture.  The remnant of the west wall from WTC 2 (south tower) can be seen in the foreground at the bottom of the picture. The WTC 2 facade appears to be between 4 and 6 stories in height. It towers over the rubble that are the remains of WTC towers 1 & 2. Immediately behind WTC 2 (left center of the picture) is where WTC 3 (Marriott Hotel) once stood. The remains of WTC 6, an 8-story building, is in the upper right of the picture; the rubble in front of that building are the remains of WTC 1 (north tower). The 8 story WTC 6 towers over the remains of WTC 1. If the pancake theory (or even traditional demolition) of the WTC towers were true, the rubble from the destruction of the towers should be 1/8 (12.5 %) the height of the original towers. Both WTC towers 1 & 2 were 110 stories in height. That means that the rubble from a pancake collapse (or traditional demolition) should have had a height of more than 13 stories. There were 6 subbasements under the WTC complex. While the subbasements suffered extensive damage, they did not suffer a collapse below street level. What is seen above ground in the picture depicts the height of the rubble from street level. Where did all of the rubble from the destruction of two quarter mile high skyscrapers go? The towers appear to have turned to dust; the rubble in the picture is not sufficient to account for the material from the destruction of the massive buildings.



The link at left is to a video clip of the WTC North Tower collapse. That was the second WTC tower to collapse. The author of the website containing the video explains: "I rented the DVD documentary 'WTC: the First 24 Hours.' This videography begins with footage from a video camera, probably on a tripod, filming the top floors of the North Tower. I captured an mpeg clip and have hopefully attached it. At 6 seconds into the clip the frame jumps around for 3 seconds. At this point the quantity and velocity of the smoke coming from the top of the tower seems to increase. At 18 seconds into the clip the tower collapses. Just 9 seconds after the frame jiggles, the tower collapses. The event was great enough to shake the ground of the area and jolt the camera on its tripod. Seismic evidence recorded at Columbia University, 21 miles away, is consistent with this thesis." That seismograph shows a large explosion measuring 2.1 on the Richter scale just before the collapse of the first (south) tower. A second large explosion which registered 2.3 on the Richter scale was detected just seconds prior to the collapse of the second (north) tower. These bursts cannot be explained by the plane collisions or the rubble from the towers hitting the ground. They happened within seconds before the collapse of the towers.  While the theory that a bomb of some sort seems plausible, the amount of rubble left over was much less than would have been expected from two 110 story skyscrapers.  That suggests device more exotic than ordinary explosives.
Watch the video of the collapse of WTC tower 7.  Tower 7 was not hit by either of the planes that hit towers 1 and 2.  In fact, Tower 7 was separated from WTC towers 1 and 2 by WTC Tower 6, which was damaged but remained standing.  The controlled collapse of Tower 7 evidences that it was destroyed by explosives designed to cut through the buildings columns.  Prior to 9-11-01 there had never been a case where a steel structured high rise has collapsed as a result of fire. The collapse of World Trade Center Tower Seven on September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m. was particularly unusual. Tower Seven had 47 stories, which made it 600 feet tall. Aside from the WTC Twin Towers, it was one of the tallest buildings in lower Manhattan. It was separated from Twin Towers by a city block. Tower 7 was fully 355 feet away from the north face of the North Tower, and Tower 6 stood between it and the North Tower. The South Tower was even further away. Tower 7 was no closer to the Twin Towers than any of the other surrounding buildings which suffered only superficial damage. Tower 7 was not struck by any of the planes or significant debris from Towers One or Two, yet mysteriously two limited fires broke out in the building and it suddenly collapsed later in the evening of September 11.  The leaseholder of the World Trade Center, Larry Silverstein, slipped up and admitted during an interview that in fact Tower 7 was intentionally demolished. In the documentary "America Rebuilds", aired September 2002, Silverstein stated: "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."  Tower 7 collapsed in a controlled fashion within its own footprint as though it was rigged with explosives. It would have taken days to rig that tower with explosives, so it must have been done in anticipation of the attacks well in advance of 9-11-01. If tower 7 was rigged with explosives days before 9-11, that suggests that the entire 9-11 tragedy was an inside job planned and orchestrated ahead of time.  The collapse of Tower 7 was much different from the collapses of Towers 1 and 2, both of which turned to dust from the top down.
The devil makes an appearance in the smoke of his handy work during the 9-11 destruction of the World Trade Center.  Mark Philips took this photo from the rooftop of his Brooklyn apartment.  This photo has been blown up, allegedly it has not been retouched.  Click on the thumbnail of the photo to see it full size.

Is Mark Philips' photo just a coincidence?  Here is another thumbnail image of a photo of the devil, which showed up on a CNN video clip of the 9-11 WTC destruction.
Yet another WTC smoke devil.  Are you starting to get the picture?


See the video of Andrew Card telling President Bush about the second plane hitting the World Trade Center.  Remember at the time Card tells Bush about the second plane hitting the World Trade Center Bush already knew that first plane had hit one of the towers.  Bush later stated that he saw the first plane hit on video prior to going into the classroom.  Whose video was he watching?  No media outlet in the country had a video of the first plane crash available to broadcast until several hours later, yet Bush is watching the crash within minutes. The only people who would have had a video available that quickly would have been those who knew in advance what was going to happen and were set up to film it. That would explain why Bush does not act surprised when Card tells him about the second plane crash.  Bush does nothing when Card tells him a second plane has hit the World Trade Center.  Bush simply turns somber and sits there and reads along as the children recite from a book about a pet goat.  One telling thing is that Card does not wait for instructions as to what actions to take.  He simply informs the President of the United States (who is the Commander and Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces) that America is under attack and immediately steps away.  How did he know that President Bush would not reply with instructions on what actions to take?  It appears upon viewing the video, that Card was not making a revelation of an unfolding tragedy so that the President could respond with instructions.  Card was simply giving a progress report of events that were expected to happen; Card then immediately walked away as though he knew that President Bush had no instructions to give. 
To the left is President George W. Bush showing his horns.  That is an occult hand signal called the horned hand or the "II Cornuto" devil sign, which represents the horns of the devil.  It is used to signal to other Satanists one's allegiance to Satan.  The sign is also used by Satanists when placing a satanic curse upon someone.

The picture to the right is of Satanists making the horned hand satanic salute to an altar displaying the Goat of Mendes or Bahomet, to acknowledge their allegiance to Satan, during a satanic ritual. 

Below is Anton LaVey, founder of the Church of Satan and author of The Satanic Bible, displaying the "horned hand" with his left hand, on the back cover of The Satanic Bible.







The top two pictures at left are of President George W. Bush again giving what appears to be the II Cornuto sign.  Some, however, believe that Bush is not giving the II Cornuto sign, but rather, he is simply showing his allegiance to the University of Texas Longhorns.  That is odd, since he graduated from Yale.  Some may argue that he is showing his allegiance to the University of Texas Longhorns because he was Governor of Texas.  Texas has over 178 colleges, it would be odd to single out one school from the 178 colleges in Texas to show special allegiance.  In addition, consider this: at recent White House Correspondents Dinner President Bush said the following about Ozzy Osbourne (pictured left bottom), who oddly enough was in attendance: "The thing about Ozzy is, he's made a lot of big hit recordings," Bush told the audience. "'Party With the Animals,' 'Sabbath Bloody Sabbath,' 'Facing Hell,' 'Black Skies' and 'Bloodbath in Paradise.' Ozzy, Mom loves your stuff."  Now that was meant to be tongue in cheek.  The sad thing, though, is that the President of the United States would even waste his breath mentioning a degenerate like Ozzy Ozbourne.  Ozbourne is the former lead singer for a Satan glorifying band, Black Sabbath.  He is a former heroin addict who has admitted to a long history of taking many other illegal drugs.  He continues to sing songs glorifying suicide and Satan.  In 1982 he was arrested for urinating on the Alamo, he bit off the head of a bat during a rock concert, and he bit off the head of a dove during a meeting with record executives.  If that isn't bad enough, he allegedly tried to murder his wife while he was touring in Moscow.  Bush knew all this before giving Ozbourne special attention at the banquet.  By mentioning him, Bush gave Ozbourne instant mainstream acceptability. Why would Bush do such a thing?  Could it be that they have more in common than is generally known?  The answer is yes.  In his autobiography, "A Charge to Keep," George W. Bush admitted that (like his father and grandfather before him) he is a member of a Satanic secret society called Skull and Bones"During my senior year I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret I can’t say anything more."  What is so secret that he cannot speak any further about it?  The secret is that in return for power, wealth, and fame, he must blindly obey his Satanic masters in their antichrist conspiracy to enslave and rule the world.  On September 29,1876, a group calling itself "The Order of File and Claw" broke into the windowless Skull and Bones building, popularly known as the "tomb," on Yale University campus. Inside room 322 of the "tomb," they found a room furnished in red velvet.  Others have seen human skulls, human bones, Nazi regalia, and other occult and Satanic symbolism inside the "tomb."  In an apparent effort to control the damage caused by recent revelations, over100 members of Skull and Bones have cooperated with journalist and author Alexandra Robbins in her writing of a book about Skull and Bones, Secrets of the Tomb.  Robbins herself admits that: "I am a member of one of Skull and Bones' kindred Yale secret societies."  She further stated that that the members of the Skull and Bones agreed to be interviewed by her because she said they "realized" she would be "fair," and they wanted to address some of the " more outrageous conspiracy theories" about the order.  See a recent video interview of Robbins on the MSNBC Today Show, where she discusses her book.  How did they "realize" Robbins would be "fair?"  I will let the readers draw their own conclusions from the fact that the publisher of the book is Time Warner Books subsidiary Little Brown.  Time Warner (then Time Life) was founded by Skull and Bones member Henry Luce.  The influence of Skull and Bones reaches far and wide in the mass media.  One of the rules of Skull and Bones is that the members of the order are required get up and leave the room if ever they are asked a question about Skull and Bones by a nonmember.  The fact that over 100 Skull and Bones members did not get up and walk out on Robbins speaks volumes.  It would be reasonable to infer that they violated the rules of the secret order because they knew that Robbins would spin the book away from their Satanic evil plans of world dominion. That conclusion becomes even more compelling when one considers that immediately prior to the book going to print Time Warner had to change the galleys because it was discovered that there was demonstrably false disinformation in the book written to discredit witnesses to parts of the Satanic Skull and Bones initiation.  The object of the the falsehood was reporter Ron Rosenbaum,  who wrote about his experience as he accompanied several others who surreptitiously infrared videotaped the courtyard portion of the Satanic initiation ceremony.  Part of the ceremony (which was inside the "tomb" and thus was not recorded), involves the inductees laying naked in a coffin and telling their deepest sexual secrets.  Anton LaVey the founder of the Church of Satan (pictured above) in his Satanic Rituals: Companion to the Satanic Bible states that such a coffin ritual is a Satanic ritual common in many pagan orders.  A powerful spiritual force charges through the participants of these ceremonies, transforming their lives dramatically.  This powerful spiritual force is a devil.  The participants in these ceremonies end up possessed by a devil.  Those who doubt that George Bush is a Satanist, should look into the Brownsville, Texas ritualistic mass murder in 1984 of 17 members of a satanic cult to which George Bush belonged.  Bush disappeared from the cult around the time of the murders and his whereabouts were not known during the ensuing three day period.
At left we see President Bush giving the sign of the devil as he poses for a picture with Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip during a visit at the White House in 2007.  He just can't help himself.
Here is former Vice President Dan Quayle showing his horns.  Is he a Texas Longhorns fan too?
Four Star General Tommy Franks, commander of U.S. Central Command and the military leader for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stands behind Bush and displays the sign of his spiritual leader.
Tom Ridge, the first Director of the newly created U.S. Department of Homeland Security, showing who his real master is.
Jordan's King Abdullah II flashing his sign of Satanic support for Vladimir Putin, President of the Soviet Federation.  Could it be that the king is simply a Texas Longhorn fan?
At left is "Christian" Rock singer Amy Grant flashing her horned solute.  This is just one indication of the satanic influence in "Christian" Rock music.  Doubters, I guess, will try to explain away such things and maybe claim that Amy Grant is just another University of Texas Longhorns fan.
Guess who that is? It is none other than Time Magazine's 2001 "Person of the Year" - Rudolph Giuliani.  He is in drag as Rudia at the annual Inner Circle banquet.



In the 2000 senatorial election, the nearest opponent to Joe Lieberman for the office of U.S. Senator from Connecticut received 448,077 votes.  Six years later in 2006 Lieberman's opponent received the exact same number of votes, 448,077.

What are the chances that Lieberman's opponent would receive the exact same number of votes in two separate elections 6 years apart? 
How can this happen?  For an explanation and more information go to .
Watch and listen to the testimony under oath before the Ohio legislature of a programmer who exposed the writing of computer codes designed to fix elections at the request of Tom Feeney, speaker of the Florida House of Representatives.

Those who doubt these results can visit the New York Times web page that reports the same 448,077 votes for the nearest opponent to Lieberman in 2006 just as was reported on the CNN web page.  You can also visit the Federal Election Commission official results for the 2000 Connecticut senate race and verify that in fact the nearest losing opponent also received 448, 077 votes in that election.

The probability that the closest losing candidate in these two successive elections would get the exact number of votes by chance is approximately one in 4 billion.  This obviously was a rigged election.

In case the news agencies and the government decide to flush these inconvenient results down the memory hole, I have downloaded and saved the CNN and New York Times web pages reporting the 2006 election results, and the Federal Election Commission web page reporting the 2000 election results.
To the left is a member of Hamas, which is a Palestinian terrorist group.  The interesting thing is that this member of Hamas has left his shirt unbuttoned which revealed a star of David tattooed on his chest.  The star of David is a uniquely Jewish symbol that no Muslim would be caught dead wearing, let alone having it tattooed on his chest.  Obviously, this Hamas member is a Jew and probably a Mossad undercover agent acting as an agent provocateur.  The most revealing  thing is that he feels comfortable enough to wear his shirt unbuttoned showing his Jewish tattoo. That means that he knew he was among friends who were fellow Israelis that were also portraying themselves as Palestinian terrorists.  The entire group of Hamas terrorists present at this meeting must have been Israelis.  This is more evidence that Israel is behind the terrorism that they then blame on the Palestinians.  The Israelis orchestrate the terrorist attacks which they then use as an excuse to clamp down on the Palestinians and take more control and land.  The 9-11 attacks on America are more instances of Mossad agent provocateurs in action.
The website where the pictures at left were posted stated:  "Below are a number of photos released by Israeli Anti-Terrorist personnel at the Worldwide Conference in Charleston, South Carolina.  All photos depict the real stuff being used against Israel and through out the mid-east by terrorists."  (emphasis added)  The odd thing is that one of the photos shows a sewing machine and other tools in the background, which suggests it is a manufacturing facility of some sort and not a law enforcement office.  Furthermore, the sign on the wall is written in English and states: "help keep this plant safe and clean."  These photos are very suspicious indeed, particularly when one considers that they depict the "real stuff being used against Israel and through out the mid-east by terrorists" and they are pictured in a manufacturing plant with a sewing machine that one would expect would be used to make the vest that is pictured.


The pictures to the left are evidence of how the news media is controlled and is used to condition the masses to believe lies. The picture depicts what appears as an emaciated man behind a fence surrounding what a British news station, ITN, described as a Bosnian Serb death camp. The truth was quite different.  The man simply had an ectomorphic physique. He was not being starved. Look at the health of the others in the supposed "death camp." The man next to him looks like a strapping, muscular, healthy man. You can see that the fence was just flimsy chicken wire. The real deception is that the man was portrayed as a Bosnian Muslim in a Serbian concentration ("death") camp.  In fact, he was a Serb who was in a holding area for Serb refugees.  The man and his entire group were not being detained inside the fence at all; they were outside the fence talking to reporters. The reporter who took the picture was actually inside the fence looking out.
To the left is a photo of a Serbian family killed by the Croatian forces during the withdrawal to the Borovo Naselje on November 19, 1991. The names of the victims are: Radosav Pavic (red top), Zoran Pavlovic, Zorica Pavlovic, Nada Pavlovic and Milojka Pavlovic. They all lived at 74 Nikole Demonje Street. However, on CNN's June 1, 1997 broadcast of their television news magazine called Impact, hosted by Christiane Amanpour, the dead Serbs in this photo were falsely described as Croats killed by Serbs. That deceptive journalism is nothing new.  History has demonstrated that tyrants have used the media to gain and keep power.


The press uses actors in its war on terrorism.  As reported by Carol Valentine: "November 10, 2001 -- The Washington Times has faked two photos in its coverage of the War On Islam. One actor was used twice: first cast as an enemy of America, then nine days later, as a friend of America. This sham illustrates the contrived nature of the War on Islam.  It indicates that those who run the press in America are those who designed this war. . . . On October 20, 2001, The Washington Times ran an 8 x 6 inch color photo above the fold on the front page.  The caption under the photo reads:  'Face of hate: A Muslim man looks up at the stage as he prays at an anti-America rally in Peshawar, Pakistan.'  . . . On October 29, The Washington Times featured another photograph, again credited to Gerald Herbert, this one measuring 8 x 5 inches.  It also appeared above the fold on pg. 1. . . . The caption under the photo reads:  'Friends and relatives of Afghan military opposition commander Abdul Haq prayed at a gathering at his home in Peshawar, Pakistan, yesterday.  The legendary mujahideen leader was captured and executed by the Taliban in southern Afghanistan Friday while he was on a mission seeking defectors.' . . .  The October 29 friend of America wears an innocent expression, but the October 20 hater scowls like a Jack-o-Lantern. The hater's eyebrows have been crudely filled in to form a monobrow, and his black beard line is high on his face, accentuating his sinister look. Theater Make-up 101"   The Washington Times has used the same actor in both pictures and deceptively portrayed the photos as candid shots!  This is just one more example of manufactured news used to condition the masses.

At left is a distant photograph of Fardus Square in Baghdad at about the time the statue of Saddam Housein was toppled on 9 April 2003.  The videos broadcast worldwide in the media were close ups of the revelry of the Iraqis.  Those close up shots gave the impression that the streets of Baghdad were packed with Iraqi citizens celebrating their "liberation."  The truth was quite different, as reported on Information Clearing House:  "The up close action video of the statue being destroyed is broadcast around the world as proof of a massive uprising. Still photos grabbed off of Reuters show a long-shot view of Fardus Square... it's empty save for the U.S. Marines, the International Press, and a small handful of Iraqis. There are no more than 200 people in the square at best. The Marines have the square sealed off and guarded by tanks. A U.S. mechanized vehicle is used to pull the statue of Saddam from it's base. The entire event is being hailed as an equivalent of the Berlin Wall falling... but even a quick glance of the long-shot photo shows something more akin to a carefully constructed media event tailored for the television cameras."  The demonstrators at Fardus Square were Ahmed Chalabi and his "Free Iraqi Forces."   They were transported to the site by the U.S. Military just before the rally toppling the statue was staged.  Chalabi and his group were flown into the southern city of Nasiriyah on 6 April 2003, 3 days before the rally at Fardus square.  This was a staged propaganda event, and the major media outlets were willing participants.
To the left is an actual certificate issued to soldiers and sailors who took part in Operation Desert Storm, which began on January 15, 1991.  The name of the sailor who received this certificate has been blocked out in order to protect his privacy.  Amazingly, the certificate itself states that the soldiers and sailors who participated in Operation Desert storm "aided in the liberation of Kuwait and the promotion of President George Bush's 'New World Order.'" The New World Order is an long sought goal of the Satanic secret societies.  Their goal is a world government under the dictatorial rule of a Satan possessed antichrist.  Former President George H.W. Bush and his son President George W. Bush are both members of "The Order of Skull and Bones," which is a chapter of the Satanic Illuminati. 


Yet another example of intentional distortion by the liberal (i.e. Zionist / communist) media. Senator Hillary Clinton was loudly booed and heckled when she walked on stage last October at a rock concert in Madison Square Garden to benefit 9/11 victims. It was shown live by VH1 but, as ABC's John Stossel revealed in a 20/20 special, VH1 sound technicians replaced the booing and heckling with cheering and applause when it was replayed. That misleading and distorted version is the permanent record VH1 put onto its DVD of the event.

As Stossel explained: "Last fall Paul McCartney headlined a concert to benefit victims of September 11th. Some politicians appeared, including Senator Hillary Clinton. And people in the audience booed her. Booed and heckled. . . .  But then MTV's channel VH1 re-ran the same concert and made it into a DVD. . . . Notice a difference?  The booing has been removed. Now and forever on the DVD the crowd applauds Senator Clinton."


Smile four seconds later Tears

See a double minded politician in action. "A double minded man [is] unstable in all his ways." James 1:8 The pictures at left are frames from a video clip of President Bill Clinton as he is leaving the funeral services for Ron Brown, his Secretary of Labor who died in a the crash of Air Force 2 under very suspicious circumstances. The autopsy revealed that Brown suffered a bullet hole in the back of his head. It has been speculated that he was cooperating with investigators and was prepared to give evidence against Bill Clinton regarding Clinton’s treasonous transfer of technology to the Chinese in return for millions of dollars.  Clinton is seen smiling and in jovial spirits as he leaves the funeral service. He then notices a camera pointed at him and in less than half a second he drops his head and his countenance becomes sullen, he then continues the act by wiping imaginary tears from his eyes. It takes Clinton only 4 seconds to go from jovial and smiling to sullen and wiping nonexistent tears from his eyes.  You can download and view the AVI video, or you can watch the GIF video on the internet.

The photo at left was taken by a pilot over Camp Gruber-Braggs, Oklahoma, in early April of 1995. Camp Gruber-Braggs is an abandoned U.S. military base. Apparently, it has not been completely abandoned.  Click on the thumbnail of the picture and you can see that there is a Ryder rental truck in one of the truck bays. The other trucks are completely covered. Notice that the entire area is cordoned off with opaque screening and each truck bay is surrounded by that same opaque screening. Obviously, whoever was running this operation did not want anyone to see what was going on inside the area.  This is a classic method used by those in secret operations: to segregate one part of the operation from another so that those working on it do not know the other parts of the operation.  This is apparently a clandestine government operation.  The operatives have enough pull with the military to set up a rather large, albeit covert, staging area, secure in the knowledge that they would be unmolested by the military.  The temporary Quonset huts and tents indicate that they have access to military supplies.  This, however, could not be an ordinary U.S. military operation.  The Ryder rental truck must be for some purpose other than ordinary military transport.  Why would the U.S. military need a Ryder truck when it owns and has at its disposal the largest fleet of trucks in the world?   The answer came just days after this photo was taken, when on 19 April 1995 the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City was destroyed by internal explosives and a Ryder truck full of explosives which was exploded outside the building.  For an excellent video on the Murrah Building destruction and the 9-11-01 attacks, download and view the Alex Jones narrated film titled 9-11: The Road to Tyranny.  You will need to install a free RealPlayer or similar software to view the film.  Alex Jones' website is at and
At left is a thumbnail of a list of dates for major news sites on the worldwide web that have been archived by the Internet Archive.  The Internet Archive, is a 501C(3) foundation located at San Francisco's Presidio that maintains a continuous "snapshot" of internet websites. Click on the thumbnail and you will see that in the weeks leading up to the attacks of 9-11-01 something very odd has happened with the archive. There are no archives for the weeks leading up to the 9-11-01 attacks.  Notice that before the gap in the archive, in the months before the attacks, the news sites were archived at the rate of every day or every other day, in some cases the sites were archived several times per day. After the attacks the sites were again archived at regular intervals. Proof of a deep and wide antichrist conspiracy is sometimes found not in what is revealed, but in what is covered up. There is something on those news websites that the conspirators do not want you to see.  This is an illustration of an Orwellian memory hole.


At left are thumbnails of 3 diagrams of the temple site next to Fort Antonia as they appeared in the time of Jesus.  The top 2 diagrams are views looking to the northwest.  The bottom diagram is a birds eye view.  Click on the thumbnails to see the full size diagrams. 

The wailing wall that many Jews visit is not the western wall from the ancient Jewish temple, but in fact is the western wall of the Roman Fort Antonia.  Fort Antonia was a permanent Roman fort at the time of Jesus.  Fort Antonia was 800 feet north of the temple and the southern wall of the fort was connected to the northern wall of the temple by double colonnades.

Jesus made it clear that the temple would be destroyed so thoroughly that "[t]here shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down."  Matthew 24:1,2; Mark 13:1,2; Luke 19:43,44; 21:5,6.  The Jews are all too happy to deceive the world into believing that Jesus was wrong.  In fact, the prophecy of Jesus was fulfilled perfectly.  The temple was completely destroyed down to the last stone, the remains that are left standing today are the remains of Fort Antonia, not the temple.

The Dome of the Rock is not as it is supposed the place where Mohamad ascended into heaven.  The Dome of the Rock is a pagan Islamic shrine built over the Roman Praetorium, which was where Pilate sentenced Jesus.  The Praetorium and was inside Fort Antonia, not the Jewish temple.







Since January 1, 2002